ArtemSosyrev

I'm finally done with all the models. Well, okay, I'm almost done. But the remaining four models will be made for Illustrious for the holidays (three for Halloween and one for Christmas/New Year's Eve), if none of you ask to make them in Illustrious in advance. Now I can be a little bit, but calm. From now on, you can send me your requests again (character name with indication for which model (SD 1.5/Pony/Illustrious) + additionally, on which platform: only here or here and on PixAI; models like SD 1.5 will be available only on PixAI), but now I will take a break for a couple of days. I will also change the schedule of work and output of models: now they will not be created at 2 a.m. according to my time, as it was recently, but somewhere from 7 a.m.Have a nice day, everyone!(the preview of the article contains an image of the latest model that I made in the Illustrious - Electirc Slide from Plants vs. Zombies: Battle for Neighborville).

We're about to end this "endless transition" to Illustrious. There are only 9 models left (excluding deferred ones, Gallade and Style Test). I will not say goodbye to Illustrious, and I will not go far from Pony either (although there will be no fewer software materials).What's next? At first, when everything is finished, I will most likely take a break (because I haven't slept well for about two and a half months). Then, I'll take up your requests again (you can write them now, but don't ask me for something sophisticated or too often). I will redo the skins for Illustrious ONLY according to your requests (you need to specify which skin). I want to say bluntly that I have some ideas for models (mainly for plants from PvZ), but I do not know exactly which ones and when I will implement them.Those who think I didn't do anything: I did something else. The problem is that due to the work on the search, the site has begun to gradually remove certain models from the search, which makes their use more difficult. That is, they are now considered by the site as "non-existent". My advice: if they somehow slip in the search, add them to your Favorites immediately so as not to lose them.It's time to lift the veil of secrecy of the "Style Test". Yes, this is a style test. And not just any artist, namely... Da-Fuze. Surely many of you have heard of him, and are also aware that he "left" us (in terms, he left, deleting all his resources, for a vague reason). I wanted to try to create his style using his Pony images, but it didn't work out very well. Perhaps I will make a second attempt in the second for Illustrious. If you have experience in creating styles, you can offer your help (both in the comments and in Discord (artemsosyrev2003); only in the case of the second option, immediately write to the point, okay?).Here is a list of models from the created ones that remain to be made for Illustrious (by usage, from more used to less):Bikini Zombie (PvZ2);Cheese Toppin Gal (Pizza Tower/minus8);Sausage Toppin Gal (Pizza Tower/minus8);Fang (Brawl Stars);Dusk Lobber (PvZ2);Tick (Brawl Stars);Tomato Toppin Gal (Pizza Tower/minus8);Electric Slide (PvZ:BfN)And here are the models that will be made for Illustrious later.:Ghost Pepper (PvZ2);Missile Toe (PvZ);Witch Hazel (PvZ);Immorticia (PvZ)I hope that everything goes well and no problems will stop me. I wish you all a good day!

Anyway, the next Illustrious LoRA will be released later. The fact is that my electricity was cut off by the time I usually do LoRA, and I got up only recently. Sorry for the delay and thanks for your understanding.

It's a funny situation right now. Two of my models now have the same number of uses, namely Surge from Brawl Stars and Beta-Carrotina from PvZ Heroes. It is noteworthy that Beta-Carrotina is better than Surge in terms of favorites, although Surge stands first in sorting by usage. But since they actually share the same place in terms of usage, and right now I can't create two models at once and none of you can influence it due to the fact that the models are AGAIN unreliable through search, it would be more logical if I prefer Beta-Carrotina. Those who wanted Surge specifically - sorry, but next time.And, taking this opportunity, I write once again: if you want to see someone early from those who remain in Illustrious, write. Don't be shy.

I posted Mina, but there is a nuance here - unfortunately, my model does not want to appear in any way through the search (the preview, if it is displayed, is just made with it). To be honest, the fact that work on improving search has been going on almost all summer is starting to annoy me wildly. If you want to use my model, you'll have to wait until the search is finally fixed (and there are plenty of problems and jambs with it). In the meantime, it's better to use a variation from ABS||AI (one of the guys who used to request LoRA from me).By the way, perhaps in the near future you will see two loras from me in one day - Parasoul from Skullgirls and Peashooter from PvZ (since Parasoul is the closest LoRA in terms of the number of uses with 125 images in the database).(my God, when is this whole orgy of search and censorship going to end?)

I decided to wait with Mina and make it only when I have collected 125 images to create the LoRA database. Now I will create according to the same principle as before.Yes, I know it's frustrating, but I don't want to be distracted by creating a new, full-fledged version for a fresh LoRA when there's plenty of material. I'm sorry, of course, but you'll have to wait until either I'm done with most of the LoRA, or there's enough material.

Tomorrow I will release two Illustrious-type LoRAs (I originally planned for today, but I almost didn't calculate the resources of Colab). So far, I have plans for Sandy (the next most popular) and... Meg. Yes, that's it. I'll skip over two models (The Beast from The Binding of Isaac and Peacock from Skullgirls). But don't worry. I'll get back to them right after that.I say right away that the decision about Meg is still ambiguous. If before 9 p.m. UTC+0 (it will be 2 a.m. for me, by which time I start making LoRA) someone offers another brawler from those that I have ready, then I will do it already, and Meg will go to wait for her turn.And I'll tell you right away: I'm fine. I know I need to get enough sleep, but I have to sit up at night to do everything.Changed: Cancellation (probably)! Only Sandy will come out. Because of my stupid Internet connection, the process stopped. Of course, there is a chance that I will be able to finish Meg (since after the Internet returned, the process continued from the same place where it left off), but there is a chance that I will have to do it later (moreover, there is only one and after Bestia and Peacock).Changed 2: Everything is fine. LoRA Meg is finished (and thank God).

As you've probably noticed, I've updated the preview images for LoRA with the Brawl Stars characters. This was done to balance the quality, as well as to ensure that the tags responsible for the "beauty" of the image were the same everywhere. Soon, this may involve LoRA with other characters.I also remind you that if you want to see certain LoRA in Illustrious in advance (except for skins), then you can write them in the comments. You need to start from the order in which they go by the number of runs (this can be tracked on the page with my models: https://tensor.art/u/672641910900289791/models). That is, for example, Nita will be next now, because she currently ranks first among LoRA without Illustrious in terms of usage. If someone asks for, say, Belle, who has few uses, then I will do it sooner before continuing to follow the same order as before. Also, I repeat once again that some LoRA will receive Illustrious either not immediately (I have such plans for some plants from PvZ), or they will not receive it at all (for example, Gallade, because it can be generated in Illustrious models without any problems, unlike Pony).

Today I will release the latest Illustrated-type LoRA related to the Bendy franchise in honor of the release of Bendy: Lone Wolf, and the only new one, namely... Alice Angel. Most likely, it was predictable. There won't be any more characters associated with this franchise (at least not in the near future, regardless of requests).On the same day, I will try to return to the previous plan (creating the Illustrious model is fine, based on the order of popularity) and make another LORA of the Illustrious type.

I recently got acquainted with the Fan Content Policy of Joey Drew Studios (which created Bendy) and there is such a clause "No NFTs or Emerging Tech: Fan content can't be used in NFTs, cryptocurrency, blockchain projects, or similar tech that conflicts with our IP rights". Unfortunately, it is written rather vaguely and it is unclear whether image generators and LoRA belong to this category, but I have a suspicion that they do.In any case, I will release all the Bendy loras that I originally planned. I'll tell you honestly, it seems to me generally doubtful to impose bans on neural networks and AI, because this slightly restricts the freedom of fan imagination. Besides, there are always a couple of people who are willing to ignore such rules. But I warn you: if I am still required to delete all content related to the X project (on behalf of the company that owns the brand itself), then I will most likely have to do this.Thank you all for your attention and understanding.

From tomorrow to August 15th, in honor of the release of Bendy: Lone Wolf, I will be creating and uploading Illustrious versions for LoRA characters from Bendy franchise (4 old + 1 new). So, the schedule for adding Illustrious by popularity will be temporarily suspended. Thanks for attention.

As you've noticed, I'm currently trying to create Illustrious versions for my current loras. And since I have MORE THAN 90 of them (minus those that are already with Illustrious and those characters that can be played without LoRA, for example, Gallade), I will now FULLY focus on them before creating new ones. Moreover, since I can only make ONE model in one day (very rarely two), I will be able to finish all this only by Halloween (if there are no more difficulties).So my request is, please don't suggest that I make new characters (which I didn't have) or alternative versions of existing ones (skins, etc.) until I'm done (with Brawl Stars characters, I'll make an exception, BUT ONLY with them, not with their skins). If you have any suggestions, which character (just the character) should I make in Illustrious one of the existing ones for the Pony type, but not yet having this type of model, suggest it.Also, I can reveal the secret of the "Style Test" model, which I have not used for a long time. If you're interested, of course (I can't do it myself, because I'm ashamed of the result). I can say that this artist left at the end of last year.

You probably noticed that I created Illustrious for a new character, but obviously not at someone's request. Yes, it is. This is the third time I can afford to create an Illustrious version.Now the question that I need your opinion on, whether you want it or not: do you want me to upload other people's models from Civitai here? But I'll make it clear right away: not on this account. I will create another account on which I will post them so as not to clog up the main one (i.e. this one). Unlike this account, the models on that account will not belong to me and I will use it only if a particular model is NOT in Tensor.Art. Basically, I will post models that I cannot create normally (for example, LoRA sliders or, for example, neclordx's Jungle De Ikou, which contains several characters at once). How do you like the idea?I say right away: I do not know which models have not been uploaded yet, because the search is still in trouble and even my original Loras have disappeared from search queries (although the publishers/creators of these models themselves can safely use them). I also want to wait until all this nonsense about censorship and payment systems is over, but I can take a chance if they don't go to the site now. And I repeat once again that I was restricted access to my account on Civitai, BUT they did not forbid me to download models from there, so I can afford it (at most I will create a new one, if it is deleted at all).Changed: I'm not forcing you to answer. I'm just interested in your opinion so that I can make a decision.Changed 2: maybe sometimes I will make Illustrious for old models not a day later, but the very next day after creation. Sometimes even twice a day to make it to the end of summer. There will also be exceptions so as not to delay this: for example, Gallade, due to the possibility of creating it on many models of this type, will not receive a version for Illustrious.

I have decided that I will produce models of the Illustrious type, but if one of the conditions is met:LoRA is very popular, but it does not yet have a version with this type of model (each version will be released in a day);If there is a request to create THIS type of model or create a different type of model from an existing LoRA, for example, a skin for a character from Brawl Stars).Also, due to my carelessness, I forgot to change the type when creating the Illustrious version of Charlie from Brawl Stars (Pony is now there, not Illustrious, although it is indicated that Illustrious). I'll try to fix it quickly. And yes, Charlie's missing too, but I hope it gets fixed.Additionally: I'm currently trying to make an Illustrious version of Valentine from Skullgirls, and I've just had a glitch when there was just nothing left to create. I hope that I have enough resources for her and Charlie to create them in one day.

As some have noticed, some LoRA have "disappeared" on Tensor.Art for some reason. And no, they are not deleted. For reasons I don't understand, the site has hidden them for some reason. I will try to find out why this happened and if it can be fixed.Changed: links have been removed because they don't work for you anyway. According to the moderators at the Discord server, they are currently trying to optimize the search. When that happens, then, in theory, everything will be fixed.Changed 2: payment systems are still to blame. I've removed all the text related to Collective Shout. Nevertheless, I hope that censorship will be eliminated. Forbidding someone to do something without having direct contact with a person is not normal.

Not so long ago, I posted my FIRST LORA of the Illustrious type. I was quite satisfied with the result. LoRA of this type was created on my own, but I'm not going to switch completely to Illustrious yet. For now, I will continue to make LoRA for Pony-type models. For Illustrious, I will perform either according to someone's requests, or, rarely, at my own request for an existing LoRA on the site.And more:- Yes, I am aware that Tensor.Art was not left alone by these payment systems (and not just him). I can understand Visa and Mastercard (and other payment systems) only if they don't force everyone they put pressure on to impose super-strict restrictions on adult content. If they overdo it, it will be a complete shame, because not all adult content is SO inadequate. The funny thing is that they have already completely stopped supporting the site, which consists entirely of such content (yes, this is very stupid);- My Civitai account is now PERMANENTLY restricted (although I can change some settings and download content from the site), so there is no point in challenging the decision. I could have kept quiet altogether if they hadn't had this strange censorship even earlier (it appeared even before the intervention). I have no idea why it wasn't fixed in any way;- Some LoRA may generate strangely, either because I couldn't write prompt properly, or because of the quantity/quality of the images I use. Keep this in mind when you ask for something;- Will I upload other people's loras from Civitai? It is likely, but for this I will create a separate account so as not to spoil the current one. I will also wait for this whole situation to subside. In fact, the idea for this came to my mind after the appearance of one slider LoRA for Pony-type models on Civitai and the appearance of the ability to adjust the minimum/maximum strength value for LoRA on this site.If there's anything else you're interested in, ask away!